Delhi Waqf Board Case: Court To Pronounce Order On Aap Legislator\'s Anticipatory Bail Plea On March 1

Delhi Waqf Board case: Court to pronounce order on AAP legislator’s anticipatory bail plea on March 1

New Delhi, Feb 24 : A Delhi court on Saturday reserved its order on AAP legislator Amanatullah Khan’s anticipatory bail plea in connection with the Delhi Waqf Board money laundering case.

 Delhi Waqf Board Case: Court To Pronounce Order On Aap Legislator's

On Tuesday, Special Judge Rakesh Syal of Rouse Avenue Court had provided the Enforcement Directorate (ED) additional time to file a reply.

The judge has now scheduled the matter for pronouncement of order on March 1.

The ED recently summoned the accused in the matter.

The ED has opposed the application, arguing that Khan may not cooperate in the investigation if he is granted pre-arrest bail.

Special Public Prosecutor Manish Jain and Simon Benjamin, representing the ED, had earlier said that Khan had previously approached the Delhi High Court against the summons, which was later withdrawn, alleging concealment of this fact in his current plea.

In response, advocate Rajat Bhardwaj, representing Khan, had opposed the extension and urged the court to adjourn the matter to either Wednesday or Friday.

He had expressed concerns about the ED’s efforts to render the application infructuous, stressing the issuance of three summons and requesting protection until the next hearing.

Senior advocate Menaka Guruswamy, representing Khan, had on Monday argued and requested interim protection but the court declined to grant the relief.

Guruswamy had pointed out that Khan had been summoned in connection with a money laundering case.

She had contested the issue of two FIRs being filed regarding the same case, with the first FIR dated November 23, 2016, filed by the CBI.

The allegation was related to Khan’s alleged wrongful appointment as chairman of the Delhi Waqf Board.

She had cited the principle of criminal law that prohibits two FIRs for one cause, noting that the second FIR was based on the same allegations as the first, despite the closure of the matter by the agency, terming it as administrative irregularities.

She had also noted out that previous bail orders in both cases concluded that there was no loss to the exchequer, as there was no evidence of bribery or recovery of proceeds of crime.

Recently, Khan withdrew from the Delhi High Court his plea challenging summons issued by the ED after it gave him no relief.

He had challenged the constitutional validity of Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and also sought a directive to quash the cases filed by the Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) and the ED.

Special Judge Syal had recently taken cognisance of an ED chargesheet filed in the case.

The ED had filed the chargesheet against Zeeshan Haider, his partnership firm Skypower, Javed Imam Siddiqui, Dawood Nasir, and Qausar Imam Siddiqui.

The case pertains to a property worth Rs 36 crore in Okhla being allegedly acquired with illicit funds, purportedly influenced by Khan, who reportedly handed over Rs 8 crore in cash.

During the investigation, the ED considered FIRs filed earlier by the CBI, ACB, and the Delhi Police.

The ED said that the property was bought at Khan’s behest, and presented with evidence of Rs 27 crore cash transaction.



#Delhi #Waqf #Board #pronounce #legislators #anticipatory # Menaka #Menaka #Delhi #New Delhi #Enforcement Directorate


Disclaimer : Editorial Team not involved in creation of this article & holds no responsibility for its content..This Article is Provided by IANS, Please contact IANS if any issues in Article .

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on WhatsAppFollow Us on Twitter