Hyderabad, Nov 12, : , Taking aim at Union Jal Shakti minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat’s criticism of Telangana Chief Minister K.Chandrasekhar Rao for his comments, T.Harish Rao, the state’s Finance and Health minister, said Friday that there was a seven-year delay by the Centre in forming a tribunal to settle the dispute between Telangana and Andhra Pradesh.Hyderabad, Nov 12th : Taking aim at Union Jal Shakti Secretary Gajendra Singh Shekhawat, who criticised Telangana Chief minister K.Chandrasekhar Rao’s comments about him, T.Harish Rao the state’s Finance and health minister on Friday stated that seven years has passed since the Centre created a tribunal to decide the dispute between Telangana and Andhra Pradesh.Hyderabad, Nov 12th, 2012 : .T.Harish Rao of the state, Finance and Health ministers, claimed that the Centre has delayed for seven years the formation of a tribunal to resolve the dispute between Telangana and Andhra Pradesh. Harish Rao said during the last seven years, the Central government has done nothing to resolve the dispute over sharing of Krishna river water.
Harish Rao stated that the Central government has not done anything to end the dispute regarding the Krishna river water sharing over the past seven years.Harish Rao claimed that during the seven years, the Central government had done nothing to solve the dispute over Krishna river water.Harish Rao stated, “During the last seven year, the Central Government has done nothing in order to resolve the dispute about the sharing of Krishna river waters.”
Stating that Telangana is seeking fair share of waters, he demanded that the Centre constitute the tribunal without any further delay.He stated that Telangana seeks fair share of water and demanded that the Centre form the tribunal immediately.Declaring that Telangana wants fair share of the waters, he demanded the Centre establish the tribunal without further delay.
He claimed that Telangana was seeking his fair share in water resources and demanded that Centre be made the tribunal.
Shekhawat on Thursday took strong exception to the chief minister’s remarks accusing the Centre of delaying the resolution on water dispute.
Shekhawat took strong exception Thursday to comments made by the chief minister accusing the Centre for delaying resolution of the water dispute.Shekhawat, on Thursday, strongly objected to the remarks of the chief minister that accused the Centre of delaying resolution on the water dispute.
Shekhawat strongly disagreed with the comments of the chief Minister accusing Centre of delaying the resolution to water dispute.
The Union minister held KCR responsible for the delay stating that due to a case filed by the Telangana state government in the Supreme Court on Krishna waters dispute in 2015, the Centre could not initiate any steps as the matter was sub judice.
KCR was held responsible by the Union minister.He stated that the Centre couldn’t take any action due to a case brought in 2015 by the Telangana government in the Supreme Court regarding the Krishna waters dispute.The matter was already sub judice.KCR was blamed by the Union minister for the delay.
This was due to a case that had been filed in 2015 by Telangana’s state government in Supreme Court over the dispute about Krishna waters.KCR was held liable by the Union minister.
It stated that KCR could not take any action because of a case in which the Telangana state government had filed in the Supreme Court in 2015 regarding the Krishna water dispute.
Harish Rao, however, argued that the court case was never an impediment in constituting a new tribunal to resolve the dispute.
Harish Rao argued, however, that the court case had never been an obstacle to the formation of a new tribunal to settle the dispute.Harish Rao however argued that the court case wasn’t an obstacle in forming a new tribunal for the resolution of the dispute.
Harish Rao, however claimed that the court case was not an obstacle to the creation of a new Tribunal to resolve the dispute.
The state minister dismissed Shekhawat’s contention that there was a delay of only four months.Shekhawat’s claim that there was only a four-month delay in processing his request was dismissed by the state minister.Shekhawat claimed that there was a four month delay.The state minister refuted this claim.Shekhawat’s assertion that there was a mere four-month delay was rejected by the state minister.He claimed that the state’s request was pending with the Centre for seven years.He claimed that the Centre was still awaiting the state’s request for seven years.
He claimed that the Centre had been awaiting the request of the state for seven years.He claimed that the Centre has been awaiting the state’s request for seven year.
He recalled in July 2014, the state had written to the Centre seeking tribunal under Interstate River Water Disputes Act.He recalled that in July 2014, Harish Rao was the irrigation minister and had written to the Centre asking for a tribunal under the Interstate River Water Disputes Act.He recalled how the state had requested a tribunal under the Interstate River Water Disputes Act in July 2014.He recalled that the state had in July 2014 written to the Centre to seek a tribunal under Interstate River Water Disputes Act.Harish Rao, who was then the irrigation minister, said the Centre took no decision for one year.Harish Rao, then the irrigation minister, stated that the Centre did not make a decision for one year.
Harish Rao was the irrigation minister at the time.He said that the Centre had not made a decision in the past year.
Harish Rao (then the irrigation minister) stated that the Centre didn’t make a decision for a year.
“It is only after 13 months that in August 2015 that the state knocked the door of the Supreme Court seeking direction to the Centre to constitute the tribunal,” he said.He said, “It was only after 13 months that the Supreme Court opened its doors in August 2015 to receive direction from the Centre for the formation of the tribunal.”He stated, “It’s only after 13months that the Supreme Court was knocked on the door asking for direction to the Centre to form the tribunal.””It was only 13 months later that in August 2015, the Supreme Court received a request from the state for directions to the Centre that would constitute the tribunal,” he stated.
Harish Rao said the matter was delayed in the Supreme Court but there was no hurdle for the Centre to constitute the tribunal.
Harish Rao stated that although the Supreme Court delayed the matter, there was no obstacle for the Centre to form the tribunal.Harish Rao claimed that the Supreme Court had delayed the matter but that there was no obstruction for the Centre in forming the tribunal.
Harish Rao indicated that while the Supreme Court delayed the matter for a while, the Centre was able to create the tribunal without any obstacles.
Earlier, the Minister for Industry, and Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) working president K.T.The Minister for Industry and Telangana rasa Samithi (TRS), working president K.T.K.T., the working president of Telangana Rashtra Samithi, and the Minister for Industry (TRS), had earlier criticized Rama Rao.K.T.was the working president of Telangana Rashithi (TRS), and the Minister For Industry.Rama Rao also slammed the Central minister saying he spoke out of ignorance.
Rama Rao also attacked the Central minister, claiming he was ignorant.Rama Rao also criticised the Central minister, saying that he was ignorant.
Rama Rao criticized the Central minister as ignorant.
Addressing a news conference, Chandrasekhar Rao had said that the Centre took seven years’ time just to refer Krishna water sharing issue to a new tribunal.
Chandrasekhar Rao, speaking at a news conference, stated that it took seven years for the Centre to refer Krishna water sharing issues to a new tribunal.Chandrasekhar Rao stated at a press conference that it took seven year for the Centre’s to refer Krishna water sharing to a new Tribunal.
Chandrasekhar Rao addressed a news conference and stated that it took the Centre seven years to refer Krishna Water Sharing issue to a different tribunal.
KCR said that he withdrew the case from the Supreme Court as promised but the Centre failed to resolve water disputes between Telangana state and Andhra Pradesh even after seven years.
KCR claimed that he withdrew his case from the Supreme Court, as promised, but the Centre failed in its duty to resolve the water disputes between Telangana and Andhra Pradesh after seven years.KCR stated that he withdrew case from Supreme Court as promised.
However, Centre failed to resolve water disputes between Telangana State and Andhra Pradesh even though it had been seven years.KCR claimed that although he withdrew a case from Supreme Court according to his promise, the Centre failed even after seven year to resolve water disputes among Telangana state (Andhra Pradesh) and Telangana #Telangana #hits #Shekhawat #AndhraPradesh #Hyderabad
.
