Sc Orders Arrest Of Up Finance Secretary, Chief Secy, And A Broader Range Of Other Officials

SC orders arrest of UP finance secretary, chief secy, and a broader range of other officials

New Delhi, Nov 13 : The Supreme Court on Saturday junked an appeal of the Uttar Pradesh government, which could lead to the arrest of the state’s finance secretary and additional chief secretary (revenue).New Delhi, Nov 13, : , The Supreme Court rejected Saturday’s appeal by the Uttar Pradesh government.This could have led to the arrest of state finance secretary and additional chief secretary (revenue).
A bench headed by Chief Justice N.V.Ramana told the counsel for the Uttar Pradesh government, “The high court should have ordered arrest by now.”.A bench headed Chief Justice N.V.Ramana stated to the counsel for the Uttar Pradesh government that “the high court should have ordered arrest now.”

 Sc Orders Arrest Of Up Finance Secretary, Chief Secy, And A Broader Range Of Oth-TeluguStop.com

The bench also comprising justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli said that severe punishment is required in the matter, as the officials were depriving an employee of his arrears.Surya Kant, Hima Kohli and other justices were also present.

They stated that severe punishment was necessary in this matter because the officials had deprived an employee of his arrears.

The bench added, “You did nothing to abide by the orders… you have no respect for the court.”You did not abide by the orders…you have no respect for court.” This additional chief secretary appears to be very arrogant.”.The additional chief secretary seems very arrogant.”

The Allahabad High Court had issued bailable orders against the officials for delayed and partial compliance of its orders.For partial or delayed compliance with its orders, the Allahabad High Court issued bailable orders against officials.

The high court had passed several orders for the regularisation of the service and also clearance of past salary arrears of the fourth-grade employee.Many orders were passed by the high court for regularization of the service, and clearance of past salaries arrears of fourth-grade employees.

Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, representing the Uttar Pradesh government, said that the service of the petitioner, Bhuneshwar Prasad Tiwari, as ‘collection amin’ has been regularised.Aishwarya Bhati (as the Uttar Pradesh government’s Additional Solicitor General) stated that Bhuneshwar Prasad Tywari’s service as a ‘collection amin” has been formalised.

She added that juniors, who were given regular employment ahead of him, have been removed and only arrears of the salary are due.He was given regular employment before his juniors.Only arrears of salary are due.Bhati urged the top court to take a lenient view in the matter.Bhati asked the court to be lenient in the matter.

To which, the bench said, “Look at this… despite the court order, this additional chief secretary says that I will not grant the age relaxation.The bench responded by saying, “Look at this… despite court order, this additional secretary says that I won’t grant the age relaxation.” You tell all this (the defence argument for the officials) to the high court after you are arrested and produced.”.After you have been arrested, tell the high court all of this (the defense argument for the officials).

The bench, in its order, said: “Having heard the learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the petitioner — the state of Uttar Pradesh — and after carefully perusing the materials placed on record, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned interim order passed by the high court.In its order, the bench stated: “Having heard and carefully scanned the records, the learned Additional Solicitor General appeared on behalf of petitioner — the State of Uttar Pradesh — we see no reason for us to alter the impugned interim court order.The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed.Accordingly, the special leave petition is dismissed.As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory applications also stand disposed of.”.In addition to the above, all pending interlocutory requests are also disposed of.”

The top court was hearing a matter connected to the regularisation of service and payment of arrears to a ‘collection amin’ in Allahabad.A matter relating to regularization of service and the payment of arrears towards a ‘collection imin’ in Allahabad was being heard by the top court.On November 1, the high court had noted that the officials were not treating the court orders seriously, as they declined to grant arrears of salary to a person who was earlier denied the rightful claim of regularisation of service.

The high court noted on November 1 that officials did not treat the court orders seriously and declined to pay arrears to a person who had been denied regularization of service.

The high court said that it is a fit case to issue bailable warrant against additional chief secretary (revenue) and Sanjay Kumar, the then district magistrate currently posted as secretary (finance).

The high court ruled that the case is suitable to issue bailable warrants against Sanjay Kumar (the then district magistrate) and additional chief secretary (revenue).The high court sought their appearance before it on November 15, and issued bailable warrants.

On November 15, the high court requested their appearance and issued bailable warrants #secretary #secy #broader #range #officials #Delhi

.

Disclaimer : TeluguStop.com Editorial Team not involved in creation of this article & holds no responsibility for its content..This Article is Provided by IANS, Please contact IANS if any issues in Article .


Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on WhatsAppFollow Us on Twitter