New Delhi, Jan 10 : A Supreme Court bench on Monday recused itself from hearing a matter connected with the distribution of Krishna water dispute between Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Maharashtra, and Karnataka.
A bench comprising Justices D.Y.Chandrachud and A.S.Bopanna, after the case was called out for hearing, told counsel in the matter they belonged to Maharashtra and Karnataka.
As the state governments counsel, involved in the matter, contended that they have no objection to the bench hearing the case, the judges said that earlier Supreme Court judges Justice A.M.Khanwilkar and Justice Mohan M.Shantanagoudar had recused themselves from the matter due to similar reasons.”We don’t want ourselves to be the target of invectives,” said the bench.
The bench further added that it is better that this case is taken up for hearing by a different combination of judges.
Now, the matter will go before the Chief Justice N.V.Ramana, to assign it to some other combination of judges.
The Andhra Pradesh government had earlier claimed that the Telangana government is depriving it of its legitimate share of water for drinking and irrigation purposesand this is “unconstitutional and illegal”.
Andhra Pradesh, in its plea, submitted that Telangana is refusing to follow decisions taken in the apex council constituted under the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014, directions of Krishna River Management Board (KRMB) constituted under this Act, and directions of the Centre.The plea cited that under Section 87(1), the board can exercise jurisdiction only in respect of such aspects as are notified by the Centre, but no such notification has been issued so far.The plea argued that in view of no progress on notification of the jurisdiction of KRMB, Telangana by its acts of commission is seriously affecting the water supply to Andhra Pradesh for irrigation and other purposes.ss/vd
Andhra Pradesh argued that Telangana refuses to comply with decisions made in the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act 2014, direction of Krishna River Management Board KRMB constituted under this Act and directions from the Centre.
According to Section 87(1), the Board can only exercise its jurisdiction over aspects that have been notified by Centre.However, no notification of this kind has been made so far.In the plea, the court argued that Telangana’s acts of commission are seriously affecting water supply to Andhra Pradesh in order to affect irrigation and other purposes.
#Krishna #River #judges #recuse #Telugu #TeluguStop #Telangana #AndhraPradesh #Delhi #Krishna #Mohan #Jan #Ramana #Delhi #New Delhi #Panna #Maharashtra #Telangana
.
