Conspiracy exposed.Congress leader Sonia Gandhi wants to suppress those who oppose her.Because, the cases against YS Jagan Mohan Reddy, the chase, the bad publicity all started with the notices given by the IT officer in 2011! The ‘witness’ considered all the investments in the media as income and issued a notice to pay tax on them.The IT orders were issued When YS Jagan left the party in 2011 after a disagreement with the Congress leader!
Jagati Publications, a company owned by ‘Sakshi’, has challenged IT notices through the IT system itself.
Six months after the leaks began to surface in the yellow media over IT notices.Reports have surfaced that the investment came as a quid pro quo.
Chandrababu, was already in cahoots with the Congress.In order to implicate YS Jagan, their party leaders Baireddy Rajasekhara Reddy, K.Errannaidu and Ashok Gajapathiraju filed an impeachment petition seeking their inclusion in the High Court as Sumoto.The CBI, ED and other investigating agencies have ordered a comprehensive inquiry into the allegations.
After the TDP won in 2014, Ashok Gajapati became a minister at the Center.The most important point is that Jasti Krishnakishore, an IT official who had issued a notice to tax investments as income, has joined Ashok Gajapathiraju, the then Union Aviation Minister on behalf of the TDP, as his secretary as part of his central services.
However, for the first time, Chandrababu used the word ‘Quid Pro’ in his notices.The CBI chargesheet states that the IT department has proved ‘Quid Pro’ allegations in its investigation.
In fact, the IT tribunal issued its order on the 23rd of last month.As all this was a legal process, the ‘witness’ also insisted that it was a publicity stunt.
If not, the verdict came after CM YS Jagan met Prime Minister Modi this month.All these were exposed in the judgment of the tribunal.
The tribunal’s bench said that all allegations in the CBI chargesheet were just allegations.The ‘witness’ clarified that all the investments made in the media investments were received only after complying with all the rules legally.
The ‘witness’ at the time made it clear that everything the management had told the investors in the aftermath was shocking.The share value was also determined in accordance with the rules.
